Repeal ObamaCare - Jan 2015

Somewhat strangely, Fred Thompson seems to think so.

An editorial in today's L.A. Times addresses proposed ozone regulations by starting with an alarmist bang: "The stuff you're breathing could kill you."  The piece then goes on to assert that new ozone regs should be put into place without even hinting at the potential costs of implementation.  Carter Wood's got a succinct debunking over at the NAM blog:

Over at the Hill’s Congress blog, a place where legislators get to post substanceless political boilerplate, Charles Rangel blathers on:

The New York Times runs what I can only surmise must have been an Onion story that mysteriously slipped into the NYT layout:

The New York Times has an article today on the impending expiration of a number of low mortgage "teaser" rates on adjustable-rate mortgages.  Basically, several million people agreed to mortgages with low initial payments, but the payments are about to jump, and there are fears (probably at least somewhat accurate) that many won't be able to pay.  The good news is that even Barney Frank--not exactly a free-market hero--is refusing to initiate a broad bailout.

Presidential candidate Mitt Romney, who is known for his single payer universal health program in Massachusetts, has drastically altered his position by outlining a plan that relies on tax breaks and free market solutions rather than government mandates: