Now Is the Time to Reform Auto Insurance in Michigan

By Josh Eboch on November 08, 2011

Michigan’s no-fault auto insurance system is broken.  As a result, consumers pay among the highest rates in the nation, and rates have been rising faster in Michigan than in any other state, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

The primary driver of the high cost of insurance in Michigan is the state’s no-fault system, which is different than every other state.  Michigan’s system offers unlimited benefits with no cost controls, which has led to escalating insurance rates.  As the Rand Institute noted, “In 2007, average total auto insurance premiums in Michigan were 17 percent higher than those in the rest of the country ($928 versus $795).”

Insurance costs in Michigan are increasing much faster than costs in general under the failing no-fault insurance system.  In general, the consumer price index increased by 39 percent between 1998 and 2011; but during that same time, the average no-fault claim increased by 309 percent.

House Bill 4936 would provide important reforms that would help reduce the costs of insurance by providing consumers a choice in how much coverage they want to purchase—$250,000, $500,000, $1, million, or $5 million.  At the same time, the legislation provides a fee schedule for medical care to prevent doctors from charging higher prices under auto insurance policies than they do for other programs.  For example, under the no-fault auto insurance system, a CT neck scan costs $1867, while the same procedure only cost $461 under workmen’s comp, and just $221 under Medicare.

Reforming Michigan’s no-fault automobile insurance system would also decrease the number of uninsured motorists by reducing the costs of insurance coverage.  Currently, Michigan ranks seventh highest for the number of uninsured drivers, driven in part by the excessive costs of the current no-fault insurance system.

House Bill 4936 does not eliminate Michigan’s no-fault system.  Instead, it reforms the program by giving consumers more choice and more control over the amount of coverage they seek to purchase while creating a more sensible fee schedule to bring medical costs under the no fault system more in line with other fee schedules used by doctors.

Please call your state representatives and ask them to vote yes on HB 4936.  Insurance costs are escalating and insurance consumers are bearing the costs of a system that is no longer functioning.  HB 4936 provides greater consumer choice by implementing important, common sense reforms that will protect the long-run viability of Michigan’s automobile insurance system.

Please login or register on FreedomConnector to post a comment.
mrheld's picture
Greg Held Mandatory Auto Insurance must go... we don't need the State to force consumers to buy a product from anyone.
27 weeks 5 days ago
danttyler's picture
danttylerWhy are you coming into Michigan's business from South Dakota Mr. Held? What does South Dakota do for it's catastrophically auto injured residents? To embarrassed to educate us on the matter Mr. Held? Help us understand.
27 weeks 3 days ago
Beth Kelly's picture
Beth KellyWhile insurance costs are clearly quite high, you're sadly misinformed to think that this bill will reduce your rates. Please research and understand that less than 10 percent of the cost of your auto insurance is due to medical coverage (PIP). The OVERWHLEMING majority of premiums are for collision coverage which is not addressed in this legislation. Seriously, this is almost a bad joke. Disguising a bill written BY insurance companies and FOR insurance companies as pro-consumer is insulting. The information you present is both misleading and reckless in that you seem to be advocating for "choice" when the only thing you're truly accomplishing is assisting in undermining the medical care of injured drivers. THOUSANDS of Michigan residents will lose their jobs, 30 MILLION in anticipated cost shift to Medicaid IN THE FIRST YEAR....This bill is an outright disgrace.
27 weeks 5 days ago
Donna Reed's picture
Donna Reed(please note, FreedomWorks, you do NOT have current information on the bill; insurance amount options have changed) I deeply regret that FreedomWorks is supporting this bill. Quite frankly, it is a shift in cost from the private sector to the State of Michigan. That is only the FIRST thing wrong with this bill. If this bill becomes law - do NOT be a pedestrian, cyclist, biker or out-of-state-tourist. Despite what coverage options are selected, these people are relegated to a maximum that falls below the minimum coverage (e.g., bikers claims max out at $250K when the new current minimum is $500K). Pray you do NOT have a head injury - costs for closed-head injuries will max out insurance benefits well before you have even started rehabilitation. FreedomWorks - PLEASE reconsider your support of this bill. Summary of impact here: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/documents/2011-2012/billanalysis/House/pdf...
27 weeks 5 days ago
danttyler's picture
danttylerFirst off Josh go back to your commander Dick Armey and tell him Michigan does not need outside moneyed interests coming in and telling us what to do. He and Tom (still in prison?) DeLay wrecked and continue to trash the GOP. Place your cross hairs elsewhere. The American Legislative Exchange Committee (aka Koch Brothers Inc. or ALEC) has it's hooks into our state rep. Pete Lund who brought this proposal forward. HB 4936 will eliminate a system that supports people and allows them access to medical treatment. With this support they are able to work and pay taxes. Without it you want to increase Medicare recipients in Michigan by 20,000 people overnight? Get real dude. Go back to FreedomWorks and find issues that do not bankrupt families but truly make them stronger. Michigan residents pay a scant $145 dollars per year for the best catastrophic injury auto coverage in the world. An unregulated auto insurance industry in Michigan is what causes increasing insurance rates. HB 4936 is genocide, it will kill people. Have you spoken with any Michigan residents that will be effected?
27 weeks 3 days ago
Donna Reed's picture
Donna ReedJosh - have you reviewed the legislative summary provided in my previous comment? I do not understand why FreedomWorks is supporting a bill that will increase the number of Medicaid recipients - FreedomWorks is for SMALLER government, yes? This bill actually creates a new de facto 'agency' as well. For FreedomWorks to continue as 'the' political muscle for small government - FW's position on this legislation MUST change. Blessings!
27 weeks 14 hours ago
darrensy's picture
darren syAnd this must be mandatory implemented otherwise it will be useless, and those burdens will shoulder by most consumers. tech comm
2 weeks 2 days ago