Contact FreedomWorks

400 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 765
Washington, DC 20001

  • Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
  • Local 202.783.3870

Blog

    American Lands Council - A Constitutional Means To Financial Stability For Western States

    11/29/2013

    Federal Lands MapThe American Lands Council recently came to Oregon to discuss the dichotomy between Eastern and Western states in the percentage of land owned by the federal government. Western states have been left behind in the original federal promise to quickly dispose of federal lands after statehood is granted, and it has cost those states the ability to properly administer their own economy.

    On November 22, Ken Ivory, President of the American Lands Council, came to Oregon to talk about the power of unlocking pubic lands in Western states. He explained how the federal government had shirked its promise to the Western states; how local control was the vision of the Framers of the Constitution; and how local land control would be an immediate solution to budget woes faced by schools, state legislatures and municipalities out West.

    Ivory, who also represents the 47th District in Utah's legislature, laid out a credible case that was deeply based in fact. Some of the basics:

    • There is a Federal Fault Line between states that had their lands granted to them after statehood and those that didn't;
    • The Eastern states average less than 5% federal ownership, while Western states average more than 65% federal ownership;
    • Western states perpetually lag behind the nation in educational funding, economic development and tax revenue.

    In his presentation, Ivory repeatedly stresses that every State, upon admission to the Union, relied upon the federal government’s trust duty from 1780 forward to dispose of the public lands. Indeed, the solemn compact of statehood included the ability to access the lands and the resources they provide.

    Imagine, for instance, if North Dakota were principally under federal control. No oil boom. No economic development. No ability to create state budget surpluses based on an unemployment rate that is half the national average.

    Well, that's exactly what's happened in states like Oregon, Utah and Nevada. The inability to access the resources provided by the land within their borders has led to a tax base that is a fraction of what's required to fund basic services in these states. The way that Ivory presents the solution is, "The only solution that's big enough".

    What Ivory and the American Lands Council propose is, as he likes to say, simple but not easy. Extinguishment of federal title over public lands in the Western states was clearly intended by the Framers of the Constitution, is the proper thing to do to rebalance the power of the states vs. federal power, and is the logical thing to do to remove dictatorial power of Washington DC over lands that rightfully belong to the people. It is long past time that we explore such solutions.

    2 comments
    Jonathan Gillispie
    11/29/2013

    Why does the federal government own so much land? They've been at this for way too long! Time to give it back to the states and individuals!

    Patricia M McBride's picture
    Patricia M McBride
    12/02/2013

    In some states, aside from large areas that are inhabited, the federal government literally owns the rest of the state and controls what is done on that land. I don't believe for one minute that was ever supposed to happen, but most of what is going on in this country right now is well outside what the consitution was supposed to protect the states and the people from. Sadly, the Supreme Court has failed to stop it by using the very constitution by which they are supposed to make their findings.

    Pages