Contact FreedomWorks

400 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 765
Washington, DC 20001

  • Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
  • Local 202.783.3870

Blog

    Free Markets, or Government Knows Best?

    07/03/2012

    In 2009 the Department of Energy (DOE), under the Obama administration, began enacting the Loan Guarantee Program granting $37 billion dollars of taxpayer money to “green” energy companies in an attempt to boost alternatives to fossil fuels. The Loan Guarantee Program consists of three programs in total: Section 1703, Section 1705, and The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM). The Department of Energy has claimed that this program saved or created 62,350 jobs. However, taking a closer look at the numbers, 30 percent of these jobs are temporary construction jobs while another 50 percent will be created at Ford Motor Company.

    Under the 1705 loan program, taking up half of the funding form the Loan Guarantee Program, 2,378 permanent jobs were claimed to be created. If you do the math right, this works out to costing the taxpayer $6.7 million per job created. I don’t know about you, but if it takes the government $6.7 million to create one permanent job, something is wrong.

    Reviewing how some of the companies of the recipients of the Loan Guarantee Program and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the stimulus package) produces some alarming findings. 

     Company

     Technology

     Government  issued  Loan/Grant

     Estimated             Permanent Jobs

    Estimated Annual Generation Output (MWh)

    Georgia Power Company

     Nuclear

     $8.33 billion

     800

     17,956,000

    Solar Trust

     Solar

     $2.1 billion

     Bankrupt

     n/a

    AREVA

     Nuclear

     $2 billion

     310

     n/a

    Abengoa Solar, Inc.

     Solar

     $1.446 billion

     60

     944,000

    NRG Solar

     Solar

     $1.237 billion

     15

     739,000

    Solyndra Inc.

     Solar

     $535 million

     Bankrupt

     681,000

    Abound Solar

     Solar

     $400 million

     1,200 (Bankrupt on  6/28/2012)

     1,906,000

    LS Power Associates

     Transmission

     $343 million

     Bankrupt

     n/a

    Ener1, Battery Maker

     Lithium-ion  batteries

     $118 million

     Bankrupt

     n/a

    Kahuku Wind Power, LLC

     Wind

     $117 million

     10

     71,000

    Record Hill Wind

     Wind

     $102 million

     8

     96,000

    Cogentrix of Alamosa, LLC

     Solar

     $90.6 million

     10

     75,000

    Beacon Power

     Storage

     $43 million

     Bankrupt

     n/a

     

    The combined amount of money given to alternative energy companies, through the 1705 and 1703 Loan Programs, totals around $19.2 billion. According to the US DOE, 3,498 jobs have been or will be created because of these loans. This comes out to almost $5.5 million in cost per one permanent job created.

    Unfortunately, these projected permanent jobs created are an overestimation, if you take away the jobs lost due to six of these companies going bankrupt. Solar Millennium Inc., LSP Energy LP, Ener1 Inc., Beacon Power Corp, Abound Solar, and Solyndra LLC combined have received over $3.5 billion from the Logan Program yet have produced zero jobs and hurt the fragile U.S. economy.  

    Now it may be argued that the Loan Programs have done at least some good. The third and last program, Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM), has provided $8.5 billion worth of loans to mostly car companies, such as Ford, to update their factories making them more environmental friendly and efficient. ATVM has been projected to create 38,700 jobs (not necessarily permanent jobs) according to the DOE.

    The effort of the Obama administration to create jobs and stimulate alternative energy growth has been a disaster. Comparing job creation and energy output in private sector companies producing mostly oil and gas, to government-sponsored alternative companies yields a stark contrast.

     Company

     Technology

     Jobs  Created

     Revenue  2011

     Energy output

    BP

     Oil and Gas

     97,600

     $386.460  billion

     daily produces 3.4 million    BOE and 1.9 billion cubic  feet of natural gas

    ExxonMobil

     Oil and Gas

     82,100

     $486.4  billion

     daily produces  3.921  million BOE (barrels of oil  equivalent)and 3.9  billion  cubic feet of  natural gas

    Chevron

     Oil and Gas

     61,189

     $253.7  billion

     daily produces 2.763  million net oil-equivalent  barrels and 1.3 billion  cubic feet of natural gas

    ConocoPhillips

     Oil and Gas

     29,800

     $251.2  billion

     daily produces 2 million  barrels a day and 1.6  billion cubic feet of  natural  gas

    Chesapeake Energy

     Natural Gas

     12,600

     $11.64  billion

     daily produces 2.6 billion cubic feet of natural gas

    Peabody Energy

     Coal

     8,300

     $7.97  billion

     9 billion tons of coal   reserves 

    Arch Coal

     Coal

     7,442

     $4.2 billion

     3.1 billion tons of coal   reserves

    Williams Energy

     Natural Gas

     3,900

     $9.6 billion  (2010)

     daily produces 1.2 billion   cubic feet of natural gas

    Cloud Peak Energy

     Coal

     1,600

     $400  million

     1 billion tons of coal   reserves

     

    These nine companies alone, granted they are some of the larger energy producing companies in the country, provide our country with nearly 303,000 jobs while at the same time costing the taxpayer a whopping zero dollars!  

    So what’s the issue? Why can’t the government do just as good of a job at producing energy that private sector companies can? To answer this question we must go back to the fundamentals of economics. In the real economy, for businesses to survive they must make a profit by meeting the demands placed upon them by you and I–the consumers. What the government is trying to do is create a demand for alternative energy that is simply not there. Instead of responding to the demands of consumers, the government has its own agenda it wants to force into the market. That agenda is the reduction of greenhouse gases via green energy. Unfortunately for them such a market does not exist so companies like Solyndra and Beacon Powers go out of businesses costing taxpayers literarily billions of dollars.    

    The other issue that companies in the real economy have to address is making profit. If the technology on the market does not allow companies to make money off of alternative energy sources, than producing alternative energy is not worth it. Businesses cannot stay in business without the ability to pay their employees, keep their facilities running, and invest in new technology. Economics teaches us that given a high enough demand for a product, the free market will deliver that product to its consumers. Let the market alone and the demand of consumers will be met. Interfere with the market and money will be misallocated, jobs will be lost, and taxpayers will get very angry.

    The government needs to take a lesson from Google, one of the world’s most successful and growing businesses. After investing $168 million into an alternative energy company called Bright Source Energy, Google has since decided to cut its entire renewable energy initiative named Renewable Energy Cheaper Than Coal. Google has realized that its investment into alternative energy was a mistake–the economic laws of demand and profit are simply not met. The U.S. Department of Energy, which has given Brightsource $1.6 billion in federal loan guarantees, needs to realize its past mistakes in companies like Solyndra and Beacon Power, take the advice of Google, and stop pouring billions of taxpayer money into failing energy companies. Just this past Thursday, Abound Solar, the most productive green-energy company in terms of job creation, filed for bankruptcy. What will it take for Obama’s Department of Energy to stop this madness? The free market, not the government, knows what’s best for its customers. 

    3 comments
    Dave Hallila
    07/06/2012

    Its always the same argument. It goes around and around in a vicious circle and its rather exhausting. I like to simplify because im just a dumb redneck. Do you believe Americans can clean up the environment and create jobs while making a profit, or do you believe the government will. The proof is in our history. I really laughed at the being "left behind by the rest of the world" part. The U.S.A has been the leader in everything. The rest of the world follows us. We have created the technology that is cleaning up the environment until the government put its giant hand around the throat of the free market and choked out all advancement.

    NoMoreRepubs NoMoreRepubs
    07/04/2012

    Your article is rather useless. Its nice to see that you did plenty of work but you are trying to compare apples to oranges. How can you say "clean energy companies waste more money when hiring than established old energy companies"? First off, oil and coal are cheaper to extract and refine then green energy and as a result, allows the companies to hold on further to their profits. Second, all of the green energy companies you surveyed are no where near the size of the old energy companies. You out of all people should know that costs for running a company are always higher when first starting out or small. Third, how can you say these companies create all these jobs without consumers tax dollars? We give tax breaks to large oil companies.... there's money, shipping of jobs overseas cost american's jobs, which in turn, affects the usefulness and quantity of available tax dollars.... you neglected to name old energy companies that had gone bankrupt of failed.... when those companies crash and the employees have to apply for unemployment, that costs tax payers money.... you see the endless circle of facts that I can pull up or create to combat your ideals? Finally, the government is trying to increase our county's ability to compete in the clean energy future. I'm sorry but if you look outside some of our large cities and think our air, water, and food quality is top notch, you need to re-think what you are talking about. If we can improve our environment by moving towards a cleaner energy future, we need to do so. If we don't, when the rest of the world begins their movement, we are going to be left behind and have to import all of our products and not have and domestically produced products. Its time that you and your other republican buddies think about something besides profits for once. There is more to life than the amount of money you can make at others expense.

    -The Republican Nonsense Fighter

    Wesley Coopersmith
    07/04/2012

    First point: That's the point. We use oil and coal because its more marketable than green energy. The government is rejecting the principles of a free market and therefore is failing.
    Second point: Many of the green energy companies cited are not start-up companies but established companies that have received federal loans.
    Third point: yes we give tax breaks to oil companies but we tax them in the first place. (In a free market they would not be taxed). We also restrict where these companies can drill costing them more money. Old energy companies that go bankrupt do so on their own money not direct taxpayer money.
    Final point: Although it may sound like a 'good idea' to increase our country's ability to compete in clean energy, the reality is its harder to do than the government thinks-that's self evident by this article.
    Last points: I never said anything about our large cities' air, water, or food cleanliness. I believe we should try to keep our environment clean but the question if how to do it. Privately or government coerced?
    Thanks for the comments but please refrain from ad hominem attacks. This is a non-partisan think-tank anyway.