400 North Capitol Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
- Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
- Local 202.783.3870
In his classic economic text, The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith had the following to say about collusion: “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.”
In the private sector, this is known as price fixing, and it is illegal. The Department of Justice is charged with detecting and curtailing efforts to rig prices wherever they occur--with one notable exception. Price fixing is considered acceptable, even noble, when it is done by the government instead of by private companies.
When a handful of companies conspire to fix the price of a certain product, usually the effects are limited to a small segment of the economy. When the government does it, everyone is affected, and the damage is catastrophically worse.
The two most obvious examples of this are the Federal Reserve’s continued justification for its quantitative easing policies and the Democratic push for major increases in the minimum wage. These may seem like wildly different and unrelated issues, but fundamentally they are the same: a misguided attempt by central planners to set prices contrary to the mechanism of the market.
Let’s take quantitative easing first. With QE, the Federal Reserve intended to hold interest rates down in order to encourage businesses to borrow money and invest it in new capital and more workers. Interest rates are nothing more than the price of borrowing, so holding them down artificially is no different than centrally setting the price of any other good.
The price system is important because it reflects millions of individual decisions taking place every day. All of this information is transmitted to investors through prices, allowing them to make informed business decisions based on actual consumer behavior. When the government interferes to change prices, the information borrowers receive is wrong, and this causes them to make bad investment decisions that ultimately hurt the economy.
The minimum wage represents exactly the same problem, except that here the government is keeping prices artificially high instead of artificially low. Putting aside the hypocrisy of the government prosecuting businesses who conspire to raise prices while doing the same thing itself, high minimum wages are incredibly distortionary. Businesses have only so much money to devote to payrolls. When the price of labor rises, simple arithmetic demands that either hours be cut or fewer workers be hired. With an unemployment rate of 6.7 percent and a labor force that is smaller than it has been in decades, this is the last thing the country needs.
Federal legislators mistakenly believe that they are in a position to know what prices should be, regardless of any quaint and outmoded notions of supply and demand. This is the same kind of thinking that resulted in bread lines in the Soviet Union and gasoline shortages under Jimmy Carter. We see this exemplified in Democratic Senator Kay Hagan. Hagan has made her support of a national minimum wage a key component of her campaign, and has been vocal in her support for the Federal Reserve. When faced with a bill that would introduce more transparency and accountability into the Fed’s operations, Hagan opposed the effort, saying the following: “The immediate and broad disclosure that S. 604 would require could disrupt the financial markets, and jeopardize our country’s international finance relationships.” Just trust the experts. They know best.
Progressives think that if they can just find smart enough experts, their massive brains will be able to come up with solutions to all our economic problems. But economics does not work that way. No one, no matter how many Ph.Ds they hold, can possibly coordinate all the information created by 300 million people acting independently. It is too much for any single mind, or even a single computer model, to handle. This is what F.A. Hayek referred to as the Knowledge Problem in his groundbreaking essay The Use of Knowledge in Society.
The hubris of members of the political class in thinking they can determine prices more effectively than the market is astonishing. History has proven again and again that central planning always fails. As the old adage says, pride comes before a fall.