Contact FreedomWorks

400 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 765
Washington, DC 20001

  • Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
  • Local 202.783.3870

Blog

    There Is No Fiscal Victory in the Omnibus

    The omnibus bill being fast-tracked through Congress increases spending.  This simple fact apparently escapes some members of Congress, several of whom have been telling their constituents that the bill was a victory because our spending levels are now lower than in recent years. 

    The House Appropriations Committee is using the following chart as proof that conservatives have scored a major victory (the red edits are ours):

    HouseAppropsOmnibusEdit

    While it is absolutely true that the total spending level for 2014 is less than last year, the chart plainly shows the problem - the actual on-budget discretionary spending (the blue segment) has actually increased.  

    The red and green bars represent "emergency spending", meaning that it's spending that doesn't count towards the total authorized by Congress' budget. The red bar, Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), is wartime military spending, going down naturally because of drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The green is for other emergencies such as disaster relief - most of last year's was for the response to Hurricane Sandy.  This green bar could bump up at any time if there is a natural disaster and Congress decides to authorize more emergency funds.

    The blue bar is what this omnibus spending bill could control, and it has grown bigger for 2014 because Congress is disregarding $45 billion of the sequestration spending cuts. The whole point of the sequester was to reduce this discretionary spending, and then to keep it down. 

    If some lawmakers don't see how this is a problem, this is the simplified version of the above graph, with only the non-emergency spending. 

    JustBaseDiscretionary

    So don't let your members of Congress distract you by talking about how much less they're spending than in 2010, when the government was at the peak of one of its biggest spending sprees in history.  Since 2011, discretionary spending was going down every year - until Congress raised it this week. Period.

    At least the guilty Republicans could have the backbone to admit it.

    4 comments
    nimbi's picture
    Bob Schmokel
    01/21/2014

    it's true that the wealth around DC is intoxicating and Republicans are the party of big government just like Dems.

    Prior to Barry Goldwater, it was simply that. Then Goldwater misguidedly sided with Southern states on the states rights which was code for segregation. We lost the black vote, LBJ gave them the Great Society and they never looked back.

    Nixon took us off the gold standard so the Fed could issue fiat currency with out limit.

    Reagan was a relief from this but Bush 41 was the Rockefeller Republicans' candidate and internationalism was born again. Bush 43 was no better and spent like a drunken sailor.

    Now Obama and we all know the sins of Dems and Repubs.

    They have a political class to feed and reelections to finance with our tax dollars.

    Lynda Deming
    02/13/2014

    Odd...you claim Bush 43 spent like a drunken sailor, but no real comment about that guy they call Obama who in 5 years has spent nearly double what President Bush did in 8 years.

    And Reagan was a relief from what? He was the king of the big spenders until that guy called Obama came along.

    Francis Murray
    01/19/2014

    Impeachments and High Treason and Murder Games

    Ed Miksitz
    01/19/2014

    Yeah. The Republicans allowed the restoration of the sequestered spending. They lost ground on this budget. The parties don't like to actually cut spending because spending buys votes. The members of Congress are not working for us, the taxpayers.