Contact FreedomWorks

400 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 765
Washington, DC 20001

  • Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
  • Local 202.783.3870
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=mX_C44GW
Key Vote

Key Vote YES on the Nomination of Scott Pruitt to Serve as EPA Administrator

On behalf of FreedomWorks’ activist community, I urge you to contact your senators and ask them to support the nomination of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to serve as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

01/03/2017
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=mX_C44GW
Op-ed Placement

Pruitt's Confirmation as EPA Chief Essential to Restoring Balance of Power

The early days of the 115th Congress will see a focus on a regulatory reform, as the House of Representatives seeks to reestablish Article I of the Constitution, which delegates lawmaking authority solely to the legislative branch. Passage of legislation to rein in the regulatory state, however, is only one part of this important effort.

12/29/2016
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=mX_C44GW
Press Release

Senate Should Act Quickly to Confirm Scott Pruitt to Lead the EPA

Following the publication of an opinion piece in the Washington Examiner authored by Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) on the nomination of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to serve as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), FreedomWorks CEO Adam Brandon commented:

12/21/2016
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Paris Agreement.jpg?itok=0ZOaMa72
Blog

Climate Targets in Paris Agreement Would Impose $4.5 Trillion in Costs

If one is looking for another reason to support Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to serve as President-elect Donald Trump's administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a new report from the American Action Forum explains how environmental regulations will negative impact the economy over the next few decades.

12/19/2016
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/EPA.jpeg?itok=qpaOdxn2
Blog

How the Clean Power Plan Hurts States Represented by Democratic Senators

One of President Barack Obama's most controversial regulations is getting a lot of attention after President-elect Donald Trump nominated Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to serve as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Clean Power Plan (CPP), under the purported authority of the Clean Air Act, requires states to develop plans to reduce emissions by 32 percent below 2005 levels. If a state fails to adopt a plan, the EPA creates one for it. The rule will supposedly avert 0.015°F by 2100 of future temperature increases.

12/19/2016
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Pruitt.jpg?itok=5vhBozj4
Blog

The Radical Environmentalist Left's Smear Campaign Against Scott Pruitt

So-called “progressives” and the radical environmentalist left are attacking Scott Pruitt, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), throwing out a number of myths and, in some cases, outright falsehoods about the Oklahoma attorney general’s record. Our policy team at FreedomWorks took a look at some of the claims to set the record straight.

12/15/2016
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=mX_C44GW
Press Release

FreedomWorks Applauds Nomination of Scott Pruitt to Lead the EPA

Following the appointment of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt (R) to serve as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), FreedomWorks CEO Adam Brandon commented:

12/08/2016
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Farm-Bureau-1.jpg?itok=_JEPmCDi
Blog

Illegal Obama Administration Power Grab Attempt in the Spotlight

This week the lawsuit over the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act (CWA) took its next step at the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. The parties challenging this massive power grab include dozens of states and business groups. In their filings to the court, the challengers spelled out the illegality and unconstitutionality of the rule as well as describing the corrupt and dishonest means the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used to rush the rulemaking to completion.

11/02/2016
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/EPA_1.jpg?itok=15hrurui
Blog

Federal Appeals Court Considers Whether to Allow Global Warming Cultists to Take over the Power Grid

On Tuesday, the Obama administration’s attempt to seize control of the nation’s energy infrastructure faced its latest day in court before the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The so-called Clean Power Plan (CPP), which would more accurately be described as the Creating Poverty Plan for its increased energy costs that fall hardest on poor Americans, is the centerpiece of President Obama’s global warming agenda. It seeks to impose massive regulatory costs on the nation’s economy in order to supposedly prevent less than 0.02 degrees of temperature increase by 2100.

09/28/2016
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/climate-gate-cartoon-2.jpg?itok=Lf6Me6A2
Blog

The EPA Uses New Math to Justify Costly Global Warming Regulation

When calculating the future impacts of government action, the federal government has very specific rules about how the calculation should be done. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) clearly states that when calculating the cost of future impacts a standard “discount rate” of 7% should be used (a discount rate is used to take account of the fact that $10 today is worth more than $20 10 years from now). But when it comes to global warming regulation, that 7% rate is a problem for bureaucrats. With a 7% discount rate, the present cost of future global warming is virtually zero, even using the federal government’s excessively alarmist models. What’s a radical federal bureaucrat to do when math says that global warming will have virtually no negative economic effect? Well, they take a page from Common Core and change how they do the math.

09/09/2016

Pages