Contact FreedomWorks

111 K Street NE
Suite 600
Washington, DC 20002

  • Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
  • Local 202.783.3870
LISTEN NOWOscars Snub America, New Hampshire is Berning, & Proper Microwave Etiquette | Pardon The Disruption Listen Here

All the Latest

    Everything
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Press
  • Key Votes
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Tweets
  • Photos

About

New Energy Study Downplays Efficiency Gains
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb

New Energy Study Downplays Efficiency Gains

Absent a prolonged drop in Americans' living standards, America will still need significant new supplies of energy to fuel its growing economy regardless of conservation efforts, says a new study by the Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation (CSE), a grassroots advocacy and education organization dedicated to economic freedom. "Abundant Energy: The Building Block of Prosperity" rebuts the claim that America can avoid developing new sources of energy and modernizing its energy transmission infrastructure simply by relying on improved efficiency and conservation. In the entire post-war period from 1949, the CSE study observed that the U.S. economy reduced its energy intensity substantially -- cutting the amount of BTUs consumed per dollar of GDP virtually in half. But during the same period, demand for energy tripled nevertheless, largely because of strong economic growth. "Without the tripling of energy supplies, the strong economic growth that has made the U.S. the most powerful economy in history would not have been possible," conclude CSE analysts. Alliance spokesman Bruce Josten, Executive Vice President for Government Affairs at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said the study confirms an important point often missing in the energy debate. He noted that history and technological advances have shown that the U.S. can increase conservation and still grow its economy. But, he said, "We can't meet our energy demand through conservation alone, unless we halt economic progress, and I think most Americans would reject that approach." CSE also finds that "energy efficiency" is often misunderstood when used interchangeably with conservation. "Using less energy is efficient only if the cost of the resources needed to replace energy use is lower than the cost of the energy that is 'saved'," observes the study. For example, a household appliance may seem more efficient by using less energy, but may actually require a net increase in energy to produce, and is therefore less efficient than the product replaced. The Alliance for Energy and Economic Growth represents more than 550 energy users, ranging from small, independent businesses to the nation's largest manufacturers, as well as companies that generate and distribute energy from a diverse mix of sources -- including natural gas, oil, coal and nuclear energy -- supplying millions of households and workplaces.

01/01/2003
CSE Mobilizes Voters in New Hampshire
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb
Press Release

CSE Mobilizes Voters in New Hampshire

11/05/2002
South Dakota Election Information
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb
Press Release

South Dakota Election Information

CSE has prepared this informative brochure for South Dakota voters. Take a look at where Senator Johnson stands on the important issue of Energy Security. Click on the image to view the full brochure in Adobe Acrobat Reader.CSE is also using a consumer marketing firm to send a special HTML email to 20,000 South Dakota email addresses. Click Here to view a sample of that email message.

10/25/2002
Letter to Conferees Regarding the Comprehensive Energy Bill
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb
Press Release

Letter to Conferees Regarding the Comprehensive Energy Bill

Dear Member of Congress:

10/07/2002
Senate Dems, Conservative Groups Clash Over Energy
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb

Senate Dems, Conservative Groups Clash Over Energy

Senate Democrats and national conservative groups are tugging energy conferees in opposite directions on several so-called green provisions included in the Senate version of energy legislation now before a House-Senate conference. In a letter sent to conference committee members Friday, six conservative groups told lawmakers that the Senate's language on global climate change and a renewable portfolio standard should be "deal breakers." Specifically, the groups targeted provisions to create a national greenhouse gas database, require power plants to generate a portion of their electricity from renewable sources, require the Commerce Department to produce climate change vulnerability assessments and ask the White House to develop a strategy for stabilizing greenhouse gases. Together, the sections would "make U.S. energy supplies less abundant, less affordable and less reliable," according to the groups, which included Citizens for a Sound Economy, National Taxpayers Union, Small Business Survival Committee, Americans for Tax Reform, Consumer Alert and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. The bill should not become a "vehicle for anti-energy policies that penalize consumers, seniors, taxpayers and the economy," they wrote. Also last week, Senate Democrats released a fact sheet that defended those and other environmentally friendly provisions included in their bill. Overall, the bill would "address the long-term need to increase domestic energy supplies while promoting greater energy efficiency through the use of new clean technologies," according to a fact sheet compiled by the Democratic Policy Committee. Specifically, Democrats said their bill combines climate change mitigation with "common sense" strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reliance on traditional fossil fuels, such as a requirement that utilities generate 10 percent of their power from renewable sources. House and Senate energy conferees will resume discussions of the bill soon after returning to Capitol Hill from the August recess. Conferees will tackle the toughest energy issues beginning in the third week of September. House Energy and Commerce Chairman Tauzin, the chairman of the negotiations, hopes to wrap up work by October. - by Brody Mullins

08/22/2002
Political Inexperience, Not Greed Caused Energy Traders’ Demise
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb
Press Release

Political Inexperience, Not Greed Caused Energy Traders’ Demise

By the time voters go to the polls in November, two to three energy companies could join Enron in bankruptcy. With the public furor over declining stocks and corporate greed already at a high pitch, these new failures could bring about a new round of re-regulation to the energy sector.

08/07/2002
Letter to Congress Regarding the "Energy Policy Act of 2002"
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb
Press Release

Letter to Congress Regarding the "Energy Policy Act of 2002"

Dear Member of Congress: S. 517, the “Energy Policy Act of 2002,” will be coming to the Senate floor this week. On behalf of the nearly 300,000 members of Citizens for a Sound Economy’s (CSE) grassroots army, I urge you to oppose this legislation in its present form. This legislation does little to remove the barriers to domestic energy production that currently destabilize energy markets and contains new regulatory provisions that would raise prices, reduce energy availability, and increase costs and limit choices for energy consumers.

02/27/2002
Energy Battle Brewing
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb
Press Release

Energy Battle Brewing

The Senate tackles a number of important issues this week, and the debate over energy policy may be one of the most important. While the economics of energy may lack the scandal-tinged allure of campaign finance reform, the decisions Congress makes about energy this week will have a much greater impact on the average American than Washington’s self-touted efforts to clean up politics. Political reform is a perennial issue and it is questionable to expect politicians to pass laws that would make their lives more difficult. As Ronald Reagan noted, “Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to understand that it bears a very close resemblance to the first.” Energy, on the other hand, is vital to virtually every good and service we purchase; what happens in the Senate this week could mean big changes that affect all Americans.

02/26/2002
Newsweek: Lobbyist Gillespie's Corporate Clients, Including Enron, Funded 'Independent' Energy Advocacy Project
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb

Newsweek: Lobbyist Gillespie's Corporate Clients, Including Enron, Funded 'Independent' Energy Advocacy Project

An independent advocacy group, started last spring by Washington lobbyist Ed Gillespie to promote the president's energy plan, was funded entirely by Gillespie's corporate lobbying clients, who quietly gave cash to the 21st Century Energy Project to support causes that would benefit both the companies and the president, Newsweek has learned. And one of the firms that chipped in was Enron, which stood to gain off Bush's pro-energy agenda, Investigative Correspondent Michael Isikoff reports in the February 25 issue of Newsweek (on newsstands Monday, February 18).  (Photo:  http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20020217/HSSU003 )  Sources tell Newsweek the now-bankrupt Enron gave more than $50,000 to the Project, secretly routing the money through one of its members, Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative interest group run by activist Grover Norquist. Asked about Enron, Norquist replied: "We don't disclose our donors." Another contributor was Daimler-Chrysler, which hired Gillespie, a $700,000 a year consultant to Enron who is also well-known for his tight relationships with the Bush White House, to lobby against stricter fuel economy standards.  The automaker gave $50,000 to Gillespie's project, steering the money through Citizens For a Sound Economy, a conservative think tank.  When Gillespie started calling the leaders of conservative interest groups last spring, asking them to join the group, they figured Gillespie was discreetly doing the White House's bidding, reports Isikoff.  "Administration officials generally don't ask for support directly," says American Conservative Union President David Keene. "It's more a wink and a nod."  At the time, the Project didn't get much notice.  But now, with lawyers and lobbyists in the capital scrambling to find ways around tough new restrictions on corporate campaign contributions, Gillespie's innovative Project may become a widely copied example of a way to keep the dollars flowing.  In a May press conference launching the group, Gillespie said the money came from contributions from the Project's 10 members, which included Keene's ACU and the United Seniors Association.  When Newsweek called the Fund's members and asked how much money they'd put up, eight of the 10 said they'd given no money at all: Gillespie had asked only for their support, not their cash.  The White House says it had been "notified" about Gillespie's ad campaign.  But spokesman Dan Bartlett said, "they never gave us any details on what the financing was." Gillespie says there was nothing improper about his efforts: "This was straight-forward issue advocacy."

02/17/2002
Focus Shifts to Global Crossing
null
http://fw-d7-freedomworks-org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/te_social_media_share/fw_default_0.jpg?itok=35IWEBMb

Focus Shifts to Global Crossing

BY JUBE SHIVER Jr. and KAREN KAPLAN

Interest is building on Capitol Hill for an investigation of the business and accounting practices that steered telecommunications pioneer Global Crossing Ltd. into Bankruptcy Court, stranding workers and investors with worthless stock while company executives reaped huge financial rewards. "It appears to be inevitable we will take a look at them," Ken Johnson, a spokesman for the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. W. J. "Billy" Tauzin (R-La.), said Wednesday.

02/14/2002

Pages