Issues

European Union Data Safe Harbor

The 1998 E.U. Data Protection Directive says that personal data can only be transferred to third countries that provide "adequate protection." The existence of a fairly aggressive privacy regime in the European Union creates problems for American multinational firms operating in both markets.

To avoid these potential problems, authorities in the U.S. and Europe have negotiated a "safe harbor" arrangement. Under the safe harbor, U.S. companies can voluntarily adhere to a set of data protection principles recognized by the E.U. as providing adequate protection and thus meeting the requirements of the Directive. Companies can self-certify, or join a privacy seal program like the BBB Online that has been certified as in compliance with the safe harbor agreement.

The U.S. Dept of Commerce manages the list of firms that have joined the "safe harbor." The list is publicly available, kept up to date, and includes firms that have lost safe harbor status.

On an interesting final note, despite more stringent E.U. laws, some studies have found that U.S. websites still provide better privacy protection than their European counterparts.

U.S. Dept. of Commerce Safe Harbor Site

Consumers International Privacy Study

European Commission Data Policy Site

Online Privacy Alliance White Paper on the Safe Harbor Agreement

On This Issue

By Julie Borowski on June 28, 2011

Texas to TSA: "Come and Take It."

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is a prime example of trading liberty for so-called security. The latest viral TSA outrage occurred on June 18 when officers forced a wheelchair bound, 95-year-old leukemia sufferer to remove her adult diaper. The innocent elderly woman was detained by the TSA for a whopping 45 minutes.

By Julie Borowski on November 19, 2010

Stop the TSA’s Assault on Freedom

The backlash over the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) new invasive procedures has transcended left vs. right politics. Under the banner of security, American citizens are being subjected to virtual strip searches or intrusive full contact pat downs from armed government bureaucrats. These policies do more to humiliate us and pad the pockets of lobbyists than actually keep us safe.

By Anonymous on December 31, 1969
n/a
By Anonymous on December 31, 1969
n/a
By Anonymous on December 31, 1969
n/a