Contact FreedomWorks

400 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 765
Washington, DC 20001

  • Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
  • Local 202.783.3870


    Federal File: Pork Pie

    BY Erik W Robelen
    by Erik W Robelen on 3/12/03.

    The House-Senate conference report that came with a $400 billion
    spending bill enacted last month contains a little extra reading
    material you won't find in the actual bill.

    It includes page after page of what are commonly known as earmarks.
    Critics derisively call it "pork barrel" spending, since most of the
    money goes to parochial projects in lawmakers' home states and

    The Department of Education's portion of the fiscal 2003 budget has
    more than $350 million in earmarks. None of those projects was
    subject to a grant competition. And the agency won't use a poverty
    formula to target the money to needy children.

    The Philadelphia Orchestra will get $175,000 for educational
    programs. Iowa will get yet another installment, this time $7
    million, for its school-construction demonstration program.

    A rough count showed 99 earmarks totaling about $40 million for
    Pennsylvania and 26 earmarks for about $21 million for Iowa. It
    comes as little surprise those states made out so well. Sen. Arlen
    Specter, R-Pa., chairs the Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor,
    Health and Human Services, and Education; Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa is
    the ranking Democrat.

    One earmark was especially curious. The University of Akron in Ohio
    will get $500,000 to pay for the "Exercise in Hard Choices" program,
    courtesy of Rep. Ralph Regula, R-Ohio. The program is designed "to
    help citizens and students understand the federal budget process,"
    the conference report says. Really.

    "There are days when I think I can't be surprised," said Chris
    Kinnan, a spokesman for Citizens for a Sound Economy, a
    Washington-based watchdog group: "And then I am." He suggested
    lawmakers should sign up for the program.

    But Carol Cox Wait argues that this $500,000 isn't pork. Ms.
    Wait-the president of the Washington-based Committee for a
    Responsible Federal Budget, which will be getting a subgrant from
    the University of Akron to continue its work on the project-- said
    "pork" is inserted for a purely local interest. This long-standing
    project serves a "broad national purpose," she said.

    Of course, earmarks aside, there's another reason the budget item
    is intriguing It came in a spending bill Congress completed four
    months late.

    Oh, and lawmakers never got around to agreeing on a budget
    resolution either. What's that? Sign up for "Hard Choices" and
    you'll find out.