Contact FreedomWorks

400 North Capitol Street, NW
Suite 765
Washington, DC 20001

  • Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
  • Local 202.783.3870
"Keep the Digital Wild West Wild"
"Government regulations are stifling new and innovative business models."
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/western.jpg?itok=ZRh2E68Z
Blog

Keep the Digital Wild West Wild

UPDATE 6-5-2014: In their continuing efforts to ruin all that is good and decent in the world, the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles has sent cease and desist letters to two car service companies, Uber and Lyft, operated through mobile apps. While these services provide safe, efficient, and affordable options for people to get from point A to point B, the DMV apparently thinks it is more important to protect the oligopolies of cab companies, not to mention their own revenues, than to allow consumers to buy services they overwhelmingly enjoy.

05/13/2014
"Will Lois 'Lerner' Lesson?"
"Now that the House has voted to hold Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress, will we finally get answers about the IRS targeting scandal?"
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/lois.jpg?itok=XVmONih_
Blog

Will the Contempt Vote Make Lois ‘Lerner’ Lesson?

Yesterday’s vote to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress represents another step forward in the ongoing quest to hold the agency accountable for the discrimination it practiced against conservative non-profit groups in the 2012 presidential election.

05/08/2014
"What are the Three Cs of ObamaCare's Unintended Consequences?"
"A new study confirms that the law is riddled with corporatism, cronyism, and cancellations."
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/obama-question-mark.jpg?itok=T2QIAwn7
Blog

Cronyism, Corporatism, and Cancellations: The Three Cs of ObamaCare's Unintended Consequences

Question: What do you get when you pass a law consisting of thousands of pages of regulations too numerous and complex to be understood by anyone? Answer: Unintended consequences.

05/02/2014
"Is Amazon Cheating on the Internet Sales Tax?"
"There's nothing wrong with keeping Amazon tax-free, but the online retailer wants to use taxes to stifle competition."
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/amazon.jpg?itok=ltnrbM0U
Blog

Amazon Is Not "Cheating" on the Internet Sales Tax

The National Bureau of Economic Research recently published the shocking finding that raising taxes on a service causes people to use less of that service. Despite this having been common knowledge to economists and non-economists alike for literally hundreds of years, much is being made of the study, which focuses on how the internet sales tax affects consumers’ use of Amazon.com.

05/01/2014
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Farm Subsidy_0.jpg?itok=UaZAm0r7
Blog

Climate Hubs Continue Agricultural Cronyism

Agricultural protectionism is nothing new. In 1892, President Grover Cleveland took a principled stand for limited government by vetoing a bill to bail out farmers from a crop-destroying drought. This is a portion of his response to the requested subsidies:

04/29/2014
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/450x300_reduced-fat.jpg?itok=DDNT6GQj
Blog

FCC's New Rule is Net Neutrality Lite

Proponents of net neutrality claim that all web traffic should be treated equally. This sounds nice on paper, but in fact not all web traffic is equal. Some sites, like Netflix and Youtube, suck up vast amounts of bandwidth by hosting popular video content. Bandwidth, as it turns out, doesn’t grow on trees. It must be generated at a cost to internet service providers. The big question is: who should ultimately be forced to bear this cost?

04/25/2014
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3?itok=Qtc-2Afx
Blog

Protecting Private Property

The last clause in the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” This is the provision used to defend the use of eminent domain laws, in which the government seizes private property without the consent of the owner, in order to serve some public purpose. Railroads, interstate highways, and other projects that require large swaths of land are frequently cited as justifications for the law, as it is unlikely that they could have completed—at least not without a significantly higher cost—if private land owners could simply refuse to sell to the government, regardless of the offered price.

04/23/2014
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/the-house-of-frankenstein.jpg?itok=jiLGtkhP
Blog

How Obama Created a Monster

There is an old philosophical puzzle that asks the following: If you begin to replace the parts of your car, one by one, until no original parts remain, is it still the same car? If not, at what point did the change occur?

04/22/2014
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Blinking.jpg?itok=k7hHDF3e
Blog

The IRS Blinks

Back in November, on the eve of Thanksgiving when they thought nobody would notice, the IRS surreptitiously announced its proposal of a new regulation that would severely limit the ability of tax exempt to groups to participate in the political process. The proposal was short on specifics, but the regulation would have given the IRS the power to narrowly define what constitutes “social welfare” and “political activity,” qualities it says organizations must exhibit in order to qualify for tax exempt status.

04/16/2014
""
""
http://d7.freedomworks.org.s3.amazonaws.com/styles/thumbnail/s3/field/image/Lois-Lerner.jpg?itok=deIflez3
Blog

Lois Lerner Playing the Victim Card

The saga of Lois Lerner, the IRS official who oversaw the unjust persecution of conservative and tea party organizations during the 2012 election, continues to be one of the most interesting and infuriating cases of political corruption in recent memory. After twice invoking the Fifth Amendment to avoid testifying on what she knew and when she knew it, Ms. Lerner now faces the prospect of jail time, having been officially held in contempt of Congress and recommended for criminal prosecution by the Department of Justice.

04/16/2014

Pages