111 K Street NE
Washington, DC 20002
- Toll Free 1.888.564.6273
- Local 202.783.3870
With over 4,000 documents to sort through, it's certain that we'll continue to uncover gems like "I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report, Kevin and I will keep them out somehow - even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!" (email from Dr. Phil Jones to Dr. Michael Mann of the Pennsylvania State University on how to exclude scientists with whom they disagreed from the IPCC process). Together, the Climategate files present a disturbing window into the climate change scientific community, a place where:
Using the scientific method in the broadest of terms, with hypothesis in hand, data is used to test that hypothesis, not simply confirm it regardless of information to the contrary.
It seems clear that much of the regurgitated data used to support climate change has been deliberately unchallenged.
With these new insights in hand, it seems pretty rash to implement sweeping legislative changes like cap and trade without an open examination of climate change data that has been rigorously debated in a transparent manner.
Update: Senator Inhofe at Heritage Blogger's Briefing on the "Greatest Scandal in Modern Science."