Illustrators are unique among visual artists in their use of storytelling to portray a complex ideology or concept. Many, like our January Artist, utilize quotes and phrases in their art to accentuate finer concepts or highlight specific ideas they want to express to the viewer. Some use a progression of imagery, complex compositions that move the viewer from one idea to the next, or single concepts to drive home a particular concept. A fellow SCAD graduate, Ashley is an artist whose work I have seen progress over nearly two decades. Her style is very painterly and ephemeral. One could as easily imagine her illustrations decorating the pages of a fine children’s book as the sparse walls of an upscale gallery.
Professionally, Ashley is a graphic designer. The use of computers and other technical tools inherent to the marketing industry have certainly influenced the direction of her artistic development but have made it no less traditional for the marks they have left on her creativity.
The foundations of Ashley’s work are created not only in the initial concept but also the uniqueness of expressing a complex narrative. Through the use of bold color schemes and meticulous rendering techniques, she grabs her audience and holds their attention first; allowing them to begin to process the concept in depth. It is within these principles that she can evoke thought, plant ideas, and broadcast powerful messages – forcing the surrender of attention within the mind of the viewer to her concept.
Though Ashley’s work is not inherently political, the predisposition of the viewer might take her imagery in that direction. Her bird paintings, for instance, invoke thoughts of freedom struggling to escape tyranny. Some birds are caged while others fly free. Some birds are caught in the act of escaping their bonds. Other subjects, such as King Kong, delve into social issues. Most of her subjects play on a dichotomy of whimsy and mischief through subtle symbolism and a bold underlying narrative.
Ashley has recently crossed blatantly into the political realm with a work in progress addressing the arbitrary rule-making that is crippling our education system. The bold lines and implied movement of her initial sketch foretell a compelling painting on the subject of a rampant entitlement culture replacing merit-based standards with vanity. Below, you will find her initial sketch, as well as the concept behind the painting. While perusing her wider body of work, you might imagine the final outcome of this compelling piece of art. I invite you to take a moment to view and share her art.
Work in Progress – The General’s Gifts:
My daughter’s middle school is infuriating. They have two sections of students. One group is labeled “The Gifted Program" and the rest are labeled “The General Population”. When I investigated, a clear delineation between the academic course studies within the gifted and the general programs was difficult to pinpoint. The gifted group seems to have far more students than any gifted program I’ve ever known; almost 50% of the total student body. I am of the impression that many these kids aren’t actually gifted. The program (to me) seems a product of whiny parents who feel the need for entitlement, regardless of merit. Perhaps the idea of their child labeled as part of the “General Population” doesn’t sit well with them. I agree, it’s an ugly title that strips children of self-worth, and doesn’t offer any incentive for improvement. Either they’re “gifted” or they’re part of "the great unwashed". It sounds like a prison rather than a school.
My painting is about how the gifted program at my daughter’s government school appears to be a political sham. “General Population” students are saddled with the yoke of this false "Gifted Program," educated with the same academic courses, while receiving none of the accolades therein.