The Law of Liberty: Shrinking the Regulatory States Means More Freedom for Americans
We are all familiar with the law of gravity. It is a law of nature, and thankfully, the law of gravity is not considered to be open to debate.
There are other laws of nature — immutable truths that cannot be avoided but that are not as well known.
Among these is the principle that when a government derives its power from the people, such as in a constitutional republic like the United States, every expansion in the role and power of the government automatically results in a reduction in the power and freedom of the people. This law of liberty is as unavoidable as the law of gravity.
There are three ways that government increases its power: raising taxes, increasing spending, and creating more regulation.
It’s easy to see how taxes increase government power and reduce our freedom. The more of our earnings the government takes from us for its own purposes, the less we have left to spend on ourselves and our families, and the fewer choices we have in our lives. Fewer choices means less liberty.
Because the federal government’s spending is not tied to its taxing power (it historically spends more than it collects), spending is not directly related to taxes.
Therefore, the more things our government attempts to do — i.e., the more money it spends — the less there is for us to do. This crowding out of citizens means less freedom for them.
The third part in the law of liberty is perhaps even more nefarious, because it tends to be subtler. More regulations means the government is ordering us to do something or restricting us from what we are otherwise allowed to do.
President Obama’s administration has added well over 20,000 new regulations to American law, and the cost for consumers and businesses to follow them is more than $100 billion each year.