15 Real Jobs Bills Stalled in the Senate
President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) have continuously blamed Republicans for blocking jobs bills. But this is simply not the case. The Republican-led House has passed more than 15 bills that will spur job growth while the Democratic-led Senate has failed to act. Government legislation cannot create jobs but it can help create an environment where private employers create jobs. We must put pressure on Harry Reid to bring the following House-passed real jobs bills that are currently stalled in the Senate up for a vote.
House Passed Jobs Bills
H.R. 872, the Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act
The bill would amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) to clarify that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or a state may not require a permit under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act for the application of pesticides regulated under FIFRA. The Reducing Regulatory Burdens Act would ensure that pesticide users are not faced with unnecessary regulations that harm job growth.
H.R. 910, the Energy Tax Prevention Act
The bill would strip the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of its ability to use the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases. Without this legislation, the agency will continue with its plan to implement burdensome new rules and regulations on American businesses that will have a significant negative impact on America’s economy while having virtually no positive impact on global temperatures.
Click here to see our key vote notice in support of H.R. 910.
H. J. Res. 37, Disapproval of FCC’s Net Neutrality Act
H.J. Res 37 would prohibit the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from imposing net neutrality regulations on Internet providers. Net neutrality is likely to cripple competition, restrict innovation, reduce employment and raise costs for all consumers—all of which would only exacerbate the current economic downturn. These job-killing regulations would involve significant new controls on the Internet that would have significant implications for investing in innovation and broadband deployment.
Click here to see our key vote notice in support of H. J. Res. 37.
H.R. 2018, the Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act
The bill would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to preserve the authority of each State to make determinations relating to the State's water quality standards. This would reduce the federal government’s power over individual state’s water quality standards to help increase job growth.
H.R. 1315, Consumer Financial Protection & Soundness Improvement Act
This bill is will amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to strengthen the review authority of the Financial Stability Oversight Council of regulations issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The increased accountability will help to prevent harmful job-killing regulations.
H.R. 2587, Protecting Jobs from Government Interference Act
The bill would prohibit the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) from ordering any employer to close, relocate or transfer employment under any circumstance. Federal bureaucrats should not be reversing the business decisions of private employers. Washington already has too many harmful regulations that hurt job growth. The Protecting Jobs from Government Interference Act would help ensure that the government agency does not over step their bounds by dictating decisions made by private sector companies.
Click here to see our key vote notice in support of H.R. 2587.
H.R. 2401, Transparency in Regulatory Analysis of Impacts on the Nation (TRAIN ACT)
The TRAIN Act would establish an 11-member committee, chaired by the Department of Commerce, to analyze the impacts of a number of major Environment Protection Agency (EPA) regulations. The agency often understates the negative impact its rules will have on jobs and energy prices. This is why we need a committee whose sole purpose is to analyze the cumulative impacts of EPA regulations. The TRAIN Act would push back against the EPA's unconstitutional, outrageous rules and regulations that raise energy prices for consumers, destroy jobs and increase our dependence on foreign sources of energy.
Click here to see our key vote notice in support of H.R. 2401.
H.R. 2681, Cement Sector Regulatory Relief Act
The bill would prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations from coming into effect which would place burdensome regulations on the cement industry. The cement industry estimates that the rule could destroy as many as 4,000 jobs. The Cement Sector Regulatory Relief Act would stop the unnecessary cement MACT rule which will cost thousands of jobs and hamper economic growth.
Click here to see our key vote notice in support of H.R. 2581.
H.R. 2250, EPA Regulatory Relief Act
The bill would help to curtail the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Boiler MACT regulations on boilers and industrial incinerators. The Council of Industrial Boiler Owners estimates that the regulations will cost 244,000 jobs. The EPA Regulatory Relief Act would help to roll back unreasonable regulations and save thousands of American jobs.
Click here to see our key vote notice in support of H.R. 2250.
H.R. 2273, Coal Residuals Reuse and Management Act
The bill would prohibit the EPA from regulating coal ash as a toxic waste in any state which prefers to develop its own plans in that regard. This bill would further slow the EPA’s Regulatory Trainwreck and could save thousands of jobs in coal-rich states such as West Virginia and Ohio.
H.R. 1230, Restarting American Offshore Leasing Now Act
The Restarting American Offshore Leasing Now Act (H.R. 1230) would establish statutory deadlines for sales of certain oil and gas leases in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). CBO estimates that enacting this legislation would reduce net direct spending by $25 million over the 2011-2016 period and about $40 million over the 2011-2021 period. Restarting offshore leasing will help restore thousands of jobs.
H.R. 1229, Putting the Gulf of Mexico Back to Work Act
The bill would amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to facilitate the production of American energy resources from the Gulf of Mexico. The Obama administration has delayed or canceled offshore lease sales in the Gulf of Mexico. The bill would jump start offshore oil drilling by implementing a 30-day deadline in which the secretary of the U.S. Interior Department would have to make a decision on the Gulf of Mexico drilling permit applications. The bill would likely help to create tens of thousands of jobs and strengthen the economy.
Click here to see our key vote notice in support of H.R. 1229.
H.R. 1231, Reversing President Obama’s Offshore Moratorium Act
The bill would reverse President Obama's Offshore Moratorium Act and amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to require that each 5-year offshore oil and gas leasing program offer leasing in the areas with the most prospective oil and gas resources and would establish a domestic oil and natural gas production goal. Reversing the offshore moratoriums will help restore thousands of jobs.
H.R. 2021, the Jobs and Energy Permitting Act of 2011
The bill would eliminate needless permitting delays that have stalled important energy production opportunities off the coast of Alaska. Rather than having exploration air permits repeatedly approved and rescinded by the agency and its review board, the EPA will be required to take final action – granting or denying a permit – within six months. The Jobs and Energy Permitting Act of 2011 would speed up the permit process to help create jobs.
H.R. 1938, North American-Made Energy Security Act
The bill would require the President to issue a final order granting or denying the Presidential Permit for Keystone XL 30 days after the issuance of the final environmental impact statement, but in no event later than November 1, 2011. A Canadian pipeline company, TransCanada, has long sought to increase the capacity of its Keystone pipeline system in order to bring more Canadian crude oil to American refineries. The North American-Made Energy Security Act would boost jobs and lower the price of gasoline for all Americans.



Noting, that if such regulations were made, and those regulations were not obeyed, that the federal government was RESTRICTED from even prosecuting those infractions as a crime?
Consider these LIMITATIONS upon the powers granted to the federal government.
MR. GEORGE NICHOLAS, Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788: "....As to the exclusion of a jury from the vicinage, he has mistaken the fact. The legislature may direct a jury to come from the vicinage. But the gentleman says that, by this Constitution, they have power to make laws to define crimes and prescribe punishments; and that, consequently, we are not free from torture. (a.) Treason against the United States is defined in the Constitution, and the forfeiture limited to the life of the person attainted. Congress have power to (b.) define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas (ONLY), and (c.) offences against the laws of nations; >>>>>but they "CANNOT DEFINE" or "PRESCRIBE" the punishment of ANY other crime WHATEVER, without "VIOLATING" the "CONSTITUTION". ..."
Thomas Jefferson - Kentucky Resolutions - 1798: # 2. " Resolved, That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish:Mr. PENDLETON Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788. "Suppose it was contrary to the sense of their constituents to grant exclusive privileges to citizens residing "within >>>THAT place the effect would be directly in opposition to what he says. It could have NO operation without the LIMITS of >>>"THAT" district. Were Congress to make a law granting them an exclusive privilege of trading to the East Indies, it could have >>>NO effect "THE MOMENT" it would go without >>>>>>>"THAT" PLACE; for their >>>>>"exclusive power" is >>>>>"CONFINED" to >>>>>>>>>>>"THAT" district. Were they to pass such a law, it would be NUGATORY; and "EVERY" member of the community at large could trade to the East Indies as well as the citizens of that district. This "exclusive" power is "LIMITED" to >>>>>>>"THAT" PLACE "SOLELY", for their >>>OWN preservation, which all gentlemen allow to be necessary. "
APP: They cannot arrogate any new law regulation or power outside the delegated powers.... EVER. That is why the federal compact is a REPUBLIC. Republics do not change.
Mr. PENDLETON Virginia Ratifying Convention 6-16-1788. "...With respect to the necessity of the ten miles square being superseded by the subsequent clause, which gives them power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers VESTED by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof,
I understand that clause as NOT going a "SINGLE STEP BEYOND" the "DELEGATED powers".
What can it act upon? Some power given by this Constitution. If they should be about to pass a law in consequence of this clause, they must pursue some of the "DELEGATED powers", but can by >>>>"NO MEANS" depart from them (N)OR "ARROGATE" "ANY NEW" powers; for the >>>PLAIN LANGUAGE of the clause is, to give them power to pass laws in order to give "effect" to the >>>>>>>"DELEGATED" powers"."
a.) treason,
b.) counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States,
c.) piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and
d.) offenses against the law of nations,
and >>>> NO OTHER CRIMES >>>"WHATSOEVER"; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, not prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people," therefore the act of Congress, passed on the 14th day of July, 1798, and intituled "An Act in addition to the act intituled An Act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States," as also the act passed by them on the — day of June, 1798, intituled "An Act to punish frauds committed on the bank of the United States," (>>>> and ALL their OTHER ACTS which assume to >>>CREATE, DEFINE, or PUNISH crimes, OTHER than THOSE so enumerated in the Constitution,) >>> are "ALTOGETHER" "VOID", and of "NO FORCE"; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective "STATES", each within its own territory.
This limitation on limiting where oil and other natural resources are allowed to be taken, plays to Corporate PROTECTIONISM and EXCLUDES TRUE FREE TRADE.
The last thing corporations want is the true free trade of Wildcat Drillers dropping holes everywhere to find oil.
Just as Diamonds are held from sale to keep the prices of diamonds high; The perception that oil is scarce, keeps the price of oil high;
Let us remove the abilities of both federal and state governments from imposing limitations on drilling and exploration by anyone;
THEN lets see TRUE free trade in action.
American Patriot Party.CC